The Black racist fighting imaginary demons
"I can't be racist, some of my best friends are black"
The above line has become anathema to the black racist. Consistently mocking white people and holding it up as a classic example of white people in denial about them being a racist.
Sadly, I can't use this perfectly reasonable claim. I have a very small circle of friends, none of whom are black. But it does represent the futility of arguing with the black racist. Most white people in Britain have long given up and trying to defend themselves and rightly so.
Racism will never go away, neither will the black racist, they're here to stay, the best thing to do is just ignore them.
So, in yet another of posts that I imagine nobody will ever read. I give you an article written by a champion of "how to be racist to white people and get away with it"
Imarn Ayton!
A black lady, who's small profile has already significantly dimmed over the past couple of years as more and more people see her for the racist she is, wrote this article about institutional racism.
Now, the problem with "institutional racism" is that it's not something that can be proven, you just have to accept that it exists. So without further ado let's delve deep into the mind of the black racist and see what pearls of wisdom she deigns to bestow upon us..
"In May of this year, a 20-year-old black student (who wishes to remain anonymous) was arrested by police in London. This young woman endured seven police officers holding her to the ground while they kicked and punched her (a fact they later admitted to, according to a report on the incident on Newsnight)."
Sounds nasty. But police brutality is not an uncommon thing, I know Imarn is barely a child, but I well remember the Police handling of striking miners. In fact, I could point out hundreds of cases of police brutality that don't involve any black people at all. But then Imarn uses a bit of subterfuge hoping it will slip by the reader
"She claims they also lifted her up by her braids, resulting in her hair being ripped from her scalp, and intimately strip-searched her in the presence of male officers, including one who kneeled on her neck. Luckily, she did not meet the same fate as George Floyd"
Imarn here finished her first paragraph with these final sentences. It's a classic tactic designed to lead you believe that the Police have also admitted to all of her claims (they didn't) She also fails to reveal the reason why she was treated so badly and how she found herself in the situation to begin with.
She was a passenger in a car that had been pulled over, subsequently the driver was charged with drink driving, and she admitted to resisting arrest.
That's not to say that the Police handling of her was anything less than brutal (it was horrific) But context matters. But let's move on.
"You are probably wondering what she was charged with after such humiliating and degrading treatment: having found no drugs or weapons on her, she was released without charge. This incident illustrates the fact that black people are disproportionately targeted through police stop-and-search tactics"
Imarn is hoping you don't watch the actual video. But ask yourself this. If your partner was arrested (and subsequently convicted) of drink driving how did she find herself on the floor being restrained. But no, Imarn wants you to think that she was targeted because she was black, that's simply not the case and an outright lie.
a recent set of government statistics shows black people are nine times more likely to be stopped and searched than white people – and 85 per cent of searches never actually result in a formal charge. Ironically, this percentage has not altered much since 2001, yet black people are still seemingly perceived as “the problem”
Now, I've checked the government statistics and it's nice that she cherry picked a figure like "9 times more likely" It's a bad faith argument. the numbers are massively skewed when you factor in London. London has a massive problem with gangs, a massive, massive problem with gangs, the vast majority of which are black. Is it any wonder that back feral gang members are such a disproportionate number of stop & search? I suppose we could just leave the black kids to murder each other. So her argument is not only bad faith, it's just flat out lying.
"The above is just one example of why the Met Police have been consistently accused of being “institutionally racist” – and I would happily bet my bank balance that it won’t be the last."
Institutionally racist by black people yes, and I would happily bet my bank balance that this won't be the only time you indulge in subterfuge in this article.
"Despite the term first being coined in the US in 1967 by civil rights figure Stokely Carmichael, and later expanded upon by Sir William MacPherson (UK Met Police Enquiry 1999), institutionalised racism continues to be fiercely debated – and politically rejected."
In order to act politicians need something to act against. Just because you "feel" something is true, doesn't actually make it true
"Defined as “biased everyday operational practices and procedures”, institutionalised racism is a covert form of structural racism that affects every aspect of life"
Does it now? You just don't want to present any actual evidence, I see.
"Home Office figures for England and Wales show that black people are roughly six times more likely to be subjected to “use of force” by the police than white people"
Really? You just want to throw that out there with no evidence at all? I wonder how many of this "roughly six times" group have actually resisted arrest? If indeed, this figure even exists in the first place in any other area than your fertile mind.
"While organisations may have glossy strategies and public-facing policies, what often lies beneath is an ever-expanding “normalisation” of racial bias"
Believe me Imarn, the last rabbithole you want to go down is the issue of "racial bias"
"This cumulatively results in pervasive racial disparities and inequalities"
Don't do it Imarn, this will not end well for you...
"After two decades of talking about institutionalised racism, why does the UK have a problem accepting its existence?"
Because it doesn't exist. After 2 decades you still have shown a lack of actual proof.
"Firstly, the term itself is considered contentious and therefore has been rejected and replaced by politically innocuous phrases such as diversity and inclusion (D&I). Organisations across the UK have been encouraged to have “D&I strategies”, which, let’s face it, in essence serve to ensure that they avoid discriminatory practices (AKA “institutionalised racism”). As nonsensical as it may be, attempting to rectify institutionalised racism, without truly accepting its existence, is an art form that successive British governments have learnt to master."
Lets face it Imarn, It serves to protect employers from litigation brought about by race grifters like you. It costs taxpayers millions of pounds a year to protect themselves from race hustlers. You seem to have an unusual take on it, but then again, I'm not a racist like you, I don't grift a living.
"Secondly, it could be argued that the modern British sense of good and evil was forged in the blustering speeches of Winston Churchill when opposing the Nazi regime during the Second World War."
Yeah, good innit. The British public has actually proven to be a highly resilient bunch, standing up against facism and rightly being proud of it.
"Therefore, any notion that the UK is a racist country would be firmly rejected from Lands’ End to John O’Groats. We’re supposed to be the good guys."
Well, what's wrong with that? I've never personally met any racists, unless they're hiding it from me, which would make me wonder why they felt a need to hide that. Or maybe, just maybe, British people just aren't prone to being racist.
"It is little wonder that the UK remains content to call out individual acts of racism, as opposed to admitting that “structural racism” is firmly interwoven into British society."
Steady on girl. The WHOLE of British society is racist? that's quite a claim. Let's see all the evidence then?
"Admitting widespread institutionalised racism would cause justifiable outrage within the black community and beyond"
I dunno, lefty black people seem pretty angry about everything and all the time! It would be difficult to see the outrage when they're in a permanent state of being outraged.
"Last, but by no means least, institutionalised racism – the big bad wolf that makes the faint-hearted squirm – is an uncomfortable and polarising truth, which, if acknowledged, could potentially endanger the very fabric of British identity"
Really? this big bad wolf that lives exclusively in your head that you claim is a polarising truth and could endanger British identity? I think you need to take a step back, maybe a visit to the psychiatrists, your delusion is the only thing that's making me "squirm"
"However, as a nation we have failed to grasp an unassailable truth: that we have simply transitioned from overt to covert racism – from penalty to no penalty."
I like how you claim to know the minds of well over 50 million white people. Where did you learn such supreme mindreading skills can I ask?
"Due to a change in English law, the days of individual acts of overt racism – such as openly calling a black person the n-word with no consequence – are over, but where have all the overt racists gone? Did they disappear overnight when the law changed?"
All the overt racists were then revealed to Britain as black people like you funnily enough.
We've made tons of progress, but unfortunately race grifters like you have set race relations back decades. If you can't understand how anti-white rhetoric manifests itself in actions like a vote for Brexit then you really need to look in the mirror
Britain didn't vote Brexit because it was racist, Britain voted Brexit because it was TIRED of being called racist!
And still people can't see it! It was a vast majority white population saying "If you don't like us, if you think we're all racist then FUCK OFF!
"One only needs to witness the recent outrage associated with major UK brands using black people in their TV adverts to see the scale of the problem."
It's not outrage. I've read tons of these types of threads and tweets, we're laughing at you, it's what British people do. I don't know where you were born, might very well be Britain, but you clearly have a lack of understanding of British culture.
"This isn’t academic theory, this is a truth that we as “black people” have to face"
It's neither. It's an ideology dreamt up by black Marxists like you. It's funny how black (and brown) conservatives have no problems being British, they love it, they're thriving.
But not the commies, mind you, commies in this country are never happy with "anything" no matter what their skin colour is
"So if the UK collectively fails to recognise the existence of institutionalised racism, we will continue in this perpetual state of denial"
Really? OK then, denial it is. But that's what you want isn't it? A grift that keeps giving?
Good luck Imarn, I think you're going to need it.
So that's Imarn, A very pretty face that represents the dark side of the black community
The evil side.
The grifting side.
The racist side.
Never, ever give in to a racist.
Comments
Post a Comment